American Pain Society's 27th Annual Scientific Meeting (May 8 – 10, 2008): Impact of fentanyl buccal tablet on both patient and clinician ratings of patient function

7803 Impact of fentanyl buccal tablet on both patient and clinician ratings of patient function

May 9, 2008: May 9, 2008
East Hall (Tampa Convention Center)
John T. Farrar, MD, PhD , Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Edward Michna, MD , Pain Management Center, Harvard Medical School/Brigham & Women's Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA
John Messina, PharmD , Cephalon, Inc., Frazer, PA
Fang Xie, PhD , Cephalon, Inc., Frazer, PA
We evaluated the effects of Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT) over a 12-week treatment period, with secondary assessments of patient function. Opioid-tolerant adults with chronic non-cancer pain and BTP (1-4 episodes/day) were titrated to a single successful FBT dose (100-800 mcg providing adequate analgesia without unacceptable AEs) and then entered a 4-week open-label period (at the successful dose) followed by double-blind, randomized treatment for 9 BTP episodes (6 FBT, 3 placebo). The open-label/double-blind sequence was repeated twice. Patient function was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) and three questionnaires based on the functional component of the BPI-SF. Patients and clinicians rated the level of change on items related to functioning since starting the study as a global assessment after week 12 or early withdrawal (endpoint). Evaluations included the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS; patients rated change in 3 of 7 functional factors they selected a priori as important), Patient Assessment of Function questionnaire (PAF; 7 questions rated on a 7-point scale, very much worsened to very much improved), and Clinician Assessment of Patient Function questionnaire (CAPF; 5 questions rated on a 7-point scale, very much worsened to very much improved). BPI-SF: evaluations showed little change from baseline to endpoint. GAS: 44/59 (75%) patients reported an improvement in their general activity, with similar results for other functional factors, e.g., mood (82%), sleep (63%). PAF: >50% of patients reported some improvement in 5/7 areas of functioning, including a majority who reported an improvement in the ability to perform at work (77%), participate in social events (74%), and enjoy life (76%). CAPF: Clinicians reported some improvement in each area of functioning for >60% of patients. AEs were generally typical of opioids. In conclusion, FBT had consistently positive effects on function in opioid-tolerant patients with BTP. Sponsored by Cephalon, Inc.
See more of: Poster Session II
See more of: Papers and Posters